Skip to main content

Are charities overpaying for investments?



  • The average all-in cost of a managed portfolio is approximately 1.82%p.a.
  • A 1.25% fee reduction saves £1m in fees for £1m invested over 30 years
  • Advisers offering portfolios of Exchange Traded Funds can help reduce cost of investing for Trustees
Trustees could reduce investment costs by up to £1m on a £1m investment over 30 years by using low-cost “Exchange Traded Funds” within portfolios instead of relying on active management.
Focus on fees
Traditional wealth managers’ fees average 1.82% each year to cover costs of fund research and stock selection, according to some reports[1].
However a broad body of investment research[2] suggests that the main driver of portfolio risk and return is not which stocks to choose, but the mix of assets that make up the overall portfolio. By using low-cost Exchange Traded Funds that track major asset classes, fees can be saved on the selection of funds and shares, to focus on the mix of assets instead.
Exchange Traded Funds
Exchange Traded Funds – collective investment schemes that are listed on the London Stock Exchange and can be dealt daily – are low cost funds with fees ranging between, for example, 0.07% to 0.60% each year.  Including custody and administration fees, ETF Portfolios can be delivered for under 0.50% to 1.00% each year all-in: a significant reduction compared to traditional managers.
Difference in fees
For a portfolio with a starting value of £1m and returning 5%p.a. before fees, the difference in fees between a portfolio with similar mix of assets that uses active funds costing for example 1.82%p.a. and one that uses passive funds costing for example 0.57%p.a. (a reduction of 1.25%p.a.) amounts to £1.1m in fees saved over 30 years.
Source: Compound effect of fees as defined by Total Expense Ratio (“TER”) on a £1m investment over investment term in years.
Fiduciary duties
Under the Trustee Act 2000[3], Trustees have an ongoing responsibility to keep under review arrangements with agents, including their investment providers, as well as considering investment characteristics such as suitability and diversification.  Ensuring good value for money should form part of these review arrangements.
Low-cost innovation
With a growing range of low-cost funds available from providers, Trustees can work with their wealth managers or financial advisers to consider how the overall cost of investing can be reduced.
NOTES
[1] The traditional wealth manager fee of 1.82% is calculated as the average total expense ratio (TER) of the wealth managers listed in research by Numis and Citywire published by Citywire Wealth Manager in February 2015. http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/news/discretionary-fees-laid-bare-let-the-calculations-begin/a799209 .
[2] For example Ibbotson & Kaplan (2000) Does asset allocation policy explain 40, 90, 100 Percent of Performance? http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=279096

NOTICES
I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it.
For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.  For more information see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk Photo credit: www.baconscouts.com. Chart credit: Elston Consulting
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

More for less: Stateside ETFs have just got cheaper

BlackRock announced today that is cutting its fees on its iShares Core (US) range.  Investors can gain broad market exposures for 4-14bp.  This compares to 7-25bp for the iShares Core (UK) range. A diversified multi-asset 70/30 ETF portfolio will cost US investors can 8bp (that’s 8 cents per $100), compared to 14bp for a similar strategy for UK investors. Might the UK follow suit? We’ll see. Big dreams The cuddly  caption announcing the move says “Smaller Fees means Bigger Dreams”, which is warm-hearted.  But it’s also sort of fair.  Today’s retail investor has more access to breadth and depth of international markets than our parents ever dreamed of (if they ever dreamed of that sort of thing). What does this mean, apart from being cheaper? Well firstly, Moore’s law applies to ETF pricing & capacity as much as it does to semiconductors.  That’s not  new or surprising.  But the sustained deflationary pressure on fund fees is ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UK equity "recovery" is a USD translation effect

Confidence that UK equities having "made up lost ground" post-Brexit is misplaced. The largest UK companies that make up the bulk of the FTSE 100 and the MSCI UK Index have high exposure to global earnings. Apparent "strength" in the largest UK equities is just a translation effect of that revenue exposure. So the apparent uptick in UK equities offers no real comfort for global USD-based investors. For GBP-denominated ETFs tracking MSCI UK Equity (e.g. LSE:CSUK) performance is +3.7% since the EU Referendum Day 23rd June 2016 before votes were counted. Over the same period, the USD version of the same ETF (e.g. NYSEARCA:EWU) performance is -9.3% while sterling has weakened -12.4% (FXB). Performance of MSCI UK (LSE:CSUK) in GBP since EU Referendum Performance of MSCI UK (EWU) in USD since EU Referendum Chart Source: Google Finance
Post a Comment
Read more