Skip to main content

Are charities overpaying for investments?



  • The average all-in cost of a managed portfolio is approximately 1.82%p.a.
  • A 1.25% fee reduction saves £1m in fees for £1m invested over 30 years
  • Advisers offering portfolios of Exchange Traded Funds can help reduce cost of investing for Trustees
Trustees could reduce investment costs by up to £1m on a £1m investment over 30 years by using low-cost “Exchange Traded Funds” within portfolios instead of relying on active management.
Focus on fees
Traditional wealth managers’ fees average 1.82% each year to cover costs of fund research and stock selection, according to some reports[1].
However a broad body of investment research[2] suggests that the main driver of portfolio risk and return is not which stocks to choose, but the mix of assets that make up the overall portfolio. By using low-cost Exchange Traded Funds that track major asset classes, fees can be saved on the selection of funds and shares, to focus on the mix of assets instead.
Exchange Traded Funds
Exchange Traded Funds – collective investment schemes that are listed on the London Stock Exchange and can be dealt daily – are low cost funds with fees ranging between, for example, 0.07% to 0.60% each year.  Including custody and administration fees, ETF Portfolios can be delivered for under 0.50% to 1.00% each year all-in: a significant reduction compared to traditional managers.
Difference in fees
For a portfolio with a starting value of £1m and returning 5%p.a. before fees, the difference in fees between a portfolio with similar mix of assets that uses active funds costing for example 1.82%p.a. and one that uses passive funds costing for example 0.57%p.a. (a reduction of 1.25%p.a.) amounts to £1.1m in fees saved over 30 years.
Source: Compound effect of fees as defined by Total Expense Ratio (“TER”) on a £1m investment over investment term in years.
Fiduciary duties
Under the Trustee Act 2000[3], Trustees have an ongoing responsibility to keep under review arrangements with agents, including their investment providers, as well as considering investment characteristics such as suitability and diversification.  Ensuring good value for money should form part of these review arrangements.
Low-cost innovation
With a growing range of low-cost funds available from providers, Trustees can work with their wealth managers or financial advisers to consider how the overall cost of investing can be reduced.
NOTES
[1] The traditional wealth manager fee of 1.82% is calculated as the average total expense ratio (TER) of the wealth managers listed in research by Numis and Citywire published by Citywire Wealth Manager in February 2015. http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/news/discretionary-fees-laid-bare-let-the-calculations-begin/a799209 .
[2] For example Ibbotson & Kaplan (2000) Does asset allocation policy explain 40, 90, 100 Percent of Performance? http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=279096

NOTICES
I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it.
For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.  For more information see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk Photo credit: www.baconscouts.com. Chart credit: Elston Consulting
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. When pol
Post a Comment
Read more

Market timing is a mug’s game

John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing.  While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are. Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game.  Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade.  Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes.  Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go. The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment.  An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry.  The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakness and increase their alloca
1 comment
Read more

UK votes for Brexit

UK public votes 52% to 48% to leave the EU: the exit process could take 2 to 4 years. Regional differences will create further constitutional strain on the UK Pound plunging, and expect UK Equities to follow suit. Expect flight to safety away from risk assets as the market digests the potential for structural change. Brexit it is The UK public has voted to leave the European Union after 43 years in yesterday’s referendum. Leave has 51.7% of votes so far with 71.8% turnout (higher than pervious general election) suggests a vote for Brexit by a narrow margin. The leaving process could take a minimum of two years, and even Leave campaigners don’t expect the process to complete until 2020. Opinion polls were too close to call Polling pointed to a closer result and recent momentum for the Remain campaign which had given markets an element of (false) security: the final poll put 45% Leave, 44% Remain, 11% Don’t Know.  While the binary nature of the debate suggested tha
Post a Comment
Read more