Skip to main content

Investors in UK property ETFs not affected by £9bn property funds lock-in



  • Trading in UK property funds totalling £9bn AUM has been suspended, locking investors into an asset class exposure they may no longer wish to have.
  • This is a stark reminder that the liquidity of any fund is only as good as its underlying holdings
  • Investors using UK property ETFs are unaffected owing to the more liquid nature of the structure and of the underlying



Post-Brexit fears around commercial property values has led to managers of three UK property funds locking investors in.  They fear a potential rush of investors to sell units following the Brexit result in the EU Referendum.  Decisions to suspend will typically reviewed every 28 days.  The funds affected are those managed by Standard Life, Aviva and M&G, totalling some £9bn of assets (see table).

While the justification given – to “protect the interests of all investors in the fund” – is fair and reasonable, some investors may not be too happy to be locked in for potentially quite a scary ride. 

The paternalistic reading is that investors are being protected from themselves, as they are denied the temptation to panic sell.  Funds that locked in investors in 2008 eventually “came good”.  But while investors may agree that “buy and hold” is right for the long run, that’s not the same deal as “buy and be held prisoner at the manager’s will”.

This episode shines a much needed spotlight on the opacity around the underlying liquidity within funds that trade in less liquid assets.  As always, investment funds are only as liquid as their underlying holdings.

One of the main reasons advisers give for using funds over ETFs is that daily liquidity is not necessarily important as their investors take a long-term view.  This does however deny the opportunity to make tactical adjustments to changing economic circumstances, particularly event-driven ones such as the UK referendum.

What this episode illustrates that by contrast to funds, ETFs benefit from better internal liquidity (they typically invest only in liquid securities), from better daily external liquidity (as they are both OTC and exchange-traded), and from active liquidity management (the creation and redemption of units through capital markets activity by the issuer).

For UK investors whose property exposure was through ETFs which such as iShares UK Property UCITS ETF (LSE:IUKP) which tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT UK Property Index, the flexibility remains whether to adjust exposure or to the ride this out.  And for portfolio management, flexibility counts.

In terms of underlying exposure, Property ETFs and Property Funds are similar but different.  Whereas property funds may have direct exposure to commercial or residential property, property ETFs typically own shares in listed real estate companies. 

As Property ETFs are by nature “equity only”, they can be expected to have higher volatility than property funds that which have exposure to bond-like steady streams of net rental income from less liquid direct holdings.  So if risk is defined by standard deviation, it is clearly higher for a property ETF.  If risk is defined by liquidity, it is clearly higher for a fund.


Aside from volatility, the level of yield from property ETFs relative to funds is comparable, while the overall fee level is of course much lower.

For investors seeking exposure to UK property as an asset class, then exchange-traded liquid ETFs that provide that from a portfolio construction perspective.  But importantly, property ETFs won’t share the underlying liquidity risk that is (now) all too apparent.



NOTE
Funds compared are iShares UK Property UCITS ETF (GBP), Standard Life Investments UK Real Estate Fund Retail Acc, Aviva Investors Property Trust 1 GBP Acc, M&G Feeder of Property Portfolio Sterling A Acc. Returns data as of 5th July 2016 (except M&G as of 4th July 2016).  Standard deviationfigures as of 30th June 2016 for all funds.

NOTICES: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it.
This article has been written for a US and UK audience.  Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “NYSEARCA:” (NYSE Arca Exchange) for US readers; “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers.  For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.  For more information see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk Photo credit: pictogram-free.com. Table credit: Elston Consulting

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"The Magnificent Seven": key asset classes for a diversified ETF portfolio

"Asset allocation is not everything. It's the only thing." One of the harshest lessons of the Global Financial Crisis was that when the going gets tough, correlations trend to one, giving even diversified investors very few places to hide.  It wasn't about whether or not you got burned, it was a more a question of degree. While there's a time and a place for active stock selection, from a portfolio construction perspective, it's the active management of the overall asset allocation that affects the outcome. Using ETFs for portfolio construction The growing popularity in Exchange Traded Funds is in part because of their elegance in providing broad, liquid, efficient and cost-effective market access to most major asset classes with a single trade.  We now have a broad range of building blocks with which to construct a diversified portfolio. As a result, the problem for investors has shifted from "How best can I access a broad choice of markets?", to &q…

Advisers should celebrate the launch of Vanguard D2C

After equal measures of anticipation and fear, Vanguard has finally unveiled its D2C offer for the UK retail market.  Advisers should celebrate.  Sounds contradictory? Not at all.
What’s being offered Firstly, a quick look at what is being offered.  Vanguard is offering direct access to its funds through with the option of holding them through an ISA or JISA, with a SIPP to follow.
Of most of interest (or rather for most ease), from a consumer perspective, will be the “do it for me” type of asset allocation funds that provide an entire portfolio management solution within a single fund. 
Specifically, the target risk funds, known as the Vanguard LifeStrategy funds, (with a fixed allocation to equity, e.g. 60% equity), and the target date funds, known as the Vanguard Target Retirement Funds (with a target date to match expected retirement date).
For these portfolio management funds, the OCF is, for example, 0.22% (the Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity Fund).  Adding on some 0.15% admin…

Closet index funds get a kicking

UK regulator forced a number of asset management firms to pay £34m compensation to customers for “closet indexing”Closet indexing means funds are presented as higher cost active, but actually just hug their benchmarksWe estimate there is €0.4 to €1tr of assets in “closet index” funds in Europe, depending on what criteria are applied.  Either way, fund houses have been warned
“Mutton dressed as lamb” is a derogatory old saying of something or someone that’s dressed up to look better than it is.  In olden days, some dodgy butchers would dress mutton up to look like lamb to get a higher price.  I’ve got nothing against mutton.  It offers good value for money and does a nutritious job.  But I don’t want to be given one thing when sold another. Some “active” funds that actually hug an index is another form of misrepresentation.And this month, the UK regulator got tough forcing a number of fund houses to pay £34m compensation to customers overcharged in closet index funds. As this is the fi…