Skip to main content

Market timing is a mug’s game


John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing.  While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are.

Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game.  Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade.  Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes.  Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go.

The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment.  An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry.  The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakness and increase their allocation to FTSE100 exposure where companies have predominantly foreign earnings.

So what do you do if you don’t want to time?  The answer’s simple: have a rule.  If you’re moving from holding one portfolio of risk assets to another (e.g. switching managers).  There’s no point trying to time – switching on a relevant valuation point (e.g. month or quarter end) keeps you “in the game” and allows you to reset the performance measurement clock.


If you’re moving from 100% cash to a 100% non-cash portfolio of equities and bonds, it’s slightly different: your entry point has a huge impact on long-term value of your portfolio.  In this instance, I would want to “average in”, either by allocating 1/12th of the capital each month into the proposed portfolio, or a quarter of the capital each quarter.  By using "pound cost averaging” - your entry point is exactly that: an average.

But that’s better than flipping a coin on the vicissitudes of Mr. Market.

NOTICES: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it.
This article has been written for a US and UK audience.  Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “NYSEARCA:” (NYSE Arca Exchange) for US readers; “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers.  For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.  This blog reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of Elston Consulting, its clients or affiliates.  For information and disclaimers, please see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk
Photo credit: Google Images; Chart credit: N/A; Table credit: N/A


Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous27 February 2017 at 08:01

    Hi - I don't claim that only passive investors are bad timers - just that the latest evidence suggests they are even worse than holders of active funds. Thanks for the shout-out. Best wishes, John Authers

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investors in UK property ETFs not affected by £9bn property funds lock-in

Trading in UK property funds totalling £9bn AUM has been suspended, locking investors into an asset class exposure they may no longer wish to have. This is a stark reminder that the liquidity of any fund is only as good as its underlying holdings Investors using UK property ETFs are unaffected owing to the more liquid nature of the structure and of the underlying Post-Brexit fears around commercial property values has led to managers of three UK property funds locking investors in.  They fear a potential rush of investors to sell units following the Brexit result in the EU Referendum.  Decisions to suspend will typically reviewed every 28 days.  The funds affected are those managed by Standard Life, Aviva and M&G, totalling some £9bn of assets (see table). While the justification given – to “protect the interests of all investors in the fund” – is fair and reasonable, some investors may not be too happy to be locked in for potentially quite a s...
Post a Comment
Read more