UK equity "recovery" is a USD translation effect

Confidence that UK equities having "made up lost ground" post-Brexit is misplaced.

The largest UK companies that make up the bulk of the FTSE 100 and the MSCI UK Index have high exposure to global earnings.

Apparent "strength" in the largest UK equities is just a translation effect of that revenue exposure.

So the apparent uptick in UK equities offers no real comfort for global USD-based investors.

For GBP-denominated ETFs tracking MSCI UK Equity (e.g. LSE:CSUK) performance is +3.7% since the EU Referendum Day 23rd June 2016 before votes were counted. Over the same period, the USD version of the same ETF (e.g. NYSEARCA:EWU) performance is -9.3% while sterling has weakened -12.4% (FXB).

Performance of MSCI UK (LSE:CSUK) in GBP since EU Referendum

Performance of MSCI UK (EWU) in USD since EU Referendum

Chart Source: Google Finance

Comments

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour, so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like. It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...

Market timing is a mug’s game

John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing. While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are. Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game. Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade. Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes. Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go. The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment. An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry. The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakn...

More for less: Stateside ETFs have just got cheaper

BlackRock announced today that is cutting its fees on its iShares Core (US) range. Investors can gain broad market exposures for 4-14bp. This compares to 7-25bp for the iShares Core (UK) range. A diversified multi-asset 70/30 ETF portfolio will cost US investors can 8bp (that’s 8 cents per $100), compared to 14bp for a similar strategy for UK investors. Might the UK follow suit? We’ll see. Big dreams The cuddly caption announcing the move says “Smaller Fees means Bigger Dreams”, which is warm-hearted. But it’s also sort of fair. Today’s retail investor has more access to breadth and depth of international markets than our parents ever dreamed of (if they ever dreamed of that sort of thing). What does this mean, apart from being cheaper? Well firstly, Moore’s law applies to ETF pricing & capacity as much as it does to semiconductors. That’s not new or surprising. But the sustained deflationary pressure on fund fees is ...

elstonviews

Search This Blog