Global Min Volatility index: adding to equities, funded from commodities

Adding to equities

Results of our monthly rebalancing of the Elston Strategic Beta Global Min Volatility suggests adding to Equities and further reducing exposure to Commodities.

The strategy’s current allocation to equities is 31.18% which is +4.10ppt from last month, +3.59ppt from end 2015, and -28.02ppt lower than this time last year. Allocation to commodities steadily increased from May 2015 and with a -12 month peak allocation of 19.04% in August 2015.

Over the last 12 months*, the effective return for the index is 4.14% and annualised volatility is 5.92%.

About the index

This Elston Strategic Beta Global Min Volatility Index (ticker ESBGMV) aims to provide a globally diversified multi-asset long-term growth strategy with minimised portfolio risk (minimum volatility). The index invests in ETFs which are transparent, cost-efficient, liquid vehicles that are publicly traded.

This index is weighted according to a proprietary methodology based on an optimisation strategy using an algorithm to minimise the ex-post combined volatility of the portfolio subject to various constraints, for example the maximum number of ETFs held within the index is 50.

Because risk/return characteristics of different asset classes change over time, the allocations to different ETFs of different asset classes is also dynamic, but at all times targeting the least volatile combination of asset classes.

Asset Allocation Snapshot

	May-15	Dec-15	Apr-16	May-16*
Equities	59.20%	27.59%	27.08	31.18%
Alternatives	7.63%	7.31%	9.18%	9.53%
Commodities	1.39%	15.16%	14.12%	9.16%
Corporate Bonds	15.92%	30.20%	29.7%	30.04%
Government Bonds	15.85%	19.74%	19.10%	20.10%

Source: Elston Consulting, *as at close 5^th May 2016.

Comments

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour, so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like. It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...

Market timing is a mug’s game

John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing. While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are. Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game. Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade. Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes. Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go. The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment. An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry. The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakn...

More for less: Stateside ETFs have just got cheaper

BlackRock announced today that is cutting its fees on its iShares Core (US) range. Investors can gain broad market exposures for 4-14bp. This compares to 7-25bp for the iShares Core (UK) range. A diversified multi-asset 70/30 ETF portfolio will cost US investors can 8bp (that’s 8 cents per $100), compared to 14bp for a similar strategy for UK investors. Might the UK follow suit? We’ll see. Big dreams The cuddly caption announcing the move says “Smaller Fees means Bigger Dreams”, which is warm-hearted. But it’s also sort of fair. Today’s retail investor has more access to breadth and depth of international markets than our parents ever dreamed of (if they ever dreamed of that sort of thing). What does this mean, apart from being cheaper? Well firstly, Moore’s law applies to ETF pricing & capacity as much as it does to semiconductors. That’s not new or surprising. But the sustained deflationary pressure on fund fees is ...

elstonviews

Search This Blog