Skip to main content

Fed Rate Hike Warning: never say never…



  • FOMC Board Minutes suggest potential interest rate rise next month
  • Futures market pricing a 32% chance of a hike in June, compared to a 6% chance last week and a 4% chance a fortnight ago: markets expectations are adjusting accordingly.
  • If rate hike becomes more likely, this is potentially negative for risk- and rate-sensitive asset, and gold.  Positive for dollar, short-dated bonds and financials.
  • Will Fed watch the economy, or the markets?



Fed Rate Hike Warning: never say never…
Prospects of rising interest rates sooner than the market had become ready to expect will pull away the prop for equities and hence negative equities.  The S&P500 (NYSEARCA:SPY, NYSEARCA:IVV (US); LON:CSPX (UK)) has dropped to a seven week low, and is now flat on the year, weighing down global equities (iShares MSCI ACWI Index Funds NASDAQ:ACWI (US); Vanguard FTSE All World Index LON:VWRD (UK)).

The increased chance of a Fed rate hike creates downside risk at the long end of the yield curves (e.g. iShares $ Treasury Bonds 20+ year) NYSEARCA:TLT (US); LON:IDTL (UK)), and for corporate bonds (e.g. iShares $ Corporate Bonds NYSEARCA:LQD (US); LON:LQDE (UK)).  Perhaps most at risk are high-yield bonds with the double whammy of rate rises and on valuations where investor thirst for income has led to yields being potentially over-bid (e.g iShares $ High Yield Corporate Bonds, NYSEARCA:HYG (US); LON:SHYU (UK)) .  On the flipside, there is a potential offset as the improving economic backdrop could make the case for tightening spreads.

Within the bond sector, shorter duration bonds will be less exposed (e.g. iShares $ Treasury Bonds 1-3yrs NYSEARCA:SHY (US); LON:IBTS (UK)).

An upward move in Fed Funds rate would be positive for the Dollar and hence short-dated/ultra-short dated treasuries, as the ability of earning risk-free returns on cash once again become a more likely prospect. (e.g. iShares Short Treasury Bonds NYSEARCA:SHV (US), PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active NYSEARCA:MINT (US); iShares $ Ultrashort Bonds LON:ERND (UK))
On a relative basis, a Fed Funds hike may see relative weakness in Gold (SPDR Gold Shares NYSEARCA:GLD (US); ETFS Physical Gold LON:PHAU (UK))

On a sector specific-basis, rising rates is a positive indicator for net interest margins which is supportive for banks/financials (SPDR S&P Banks NYSEARCA:KBE) (US); SPDR S&P US Financial Select Sector LON:SXLF (UK) FRA:ZPDF).

By contrast a hike would be negative for long-duration/rate-sensitive sectors such as Utilities & Financials (Utilities Select SPDR ETF NYSEARCA:XLU (US); SPDR S&P US Financial Select Sector UCITS ETF LON:SXLU (UK) FRA:ZPDU).

Property/real estate sector would likewise be negatively impacted as spreads between property yields over risk-free rate contracts: (iShares Global REIT NYSEARCA:REET (US); iShares Developed Markets Property Yield LON:IWDP (UK)). On the flipside, any uptick in the economy could be an offsetting factor.

Risk assets love the “lower for longer” support of ultra-low interest rates.  Readjustment to rising costs of capital could be painful.




NOTICES: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. This article has been written for a US and UK audience.  Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “NYSEARCA:” (NYSE Arca Exchange) for US readers; “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers.  For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice.  For more information see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk Image credit: DodgertonSkillhause http://dodger.isinthehouse.com/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Market timing is a mug’s game

John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing.  While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are. Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game.  Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade.  Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes.  Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go. The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment.  An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry.  The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakn...
1 comment
Read more

More for less: Stateside ETFs have just got cheaper

BlackRock announced today that is cutting its fees on its iShares Core (US) range.  Investors can gain broad market exposures for 4-14bp.  This compares to 7-25bp for the iShares Core (UK) range. A diversified multi-asset 70/30 ETF portfolio will cost US investors can 8bp (that’s 8 cents per $100), compared to 14bp for a similar strategy for UK investors. Might the UK follow suit? We’ll see. Big dreams The cuddly  caption announcing the move says “Smaller Fees means Bigger Dreams”, which is warm-hearted.  But it’s also sort of fair.  Today’s retail investor has more access to breadth and depth of international markets than our parents ever dreamed of (if they ever dreamed of that sort of thing). What does this mean, apart from being cheaper? Well firstly, Moore’s law applies to ETF pricing & capacity as much as it does to semiconductors.  That’s not  new or surprising.  But the sustained deflationary pressure on fund fees is ...
Post a Comment
Read more