Skip to main content

Which was the best performing UK Equity Income index in 2017?


  • In the search for yield, UK Equity Income is a key component of client portfolios.
  • There are a number of London-listed UK Equity Income ETFs to choose from, each tracking a different index methodology.
  • This report looks at the best performing UK Equity Income indices in absolute and risk-adjusted terms for GBP investors.


UK Equity Income Indices
Investors have a choice of UK Equity Income index strategies, each with different risk-return characteristics, weightings methodologies and factor tilts.
These difference influence the performance of each index strategy (all figures below are on a total return basis for GBP investors).

Best performing for 2017
The best performing strategies for UK Equity Income in 2017 were:

  1. +12.3% total return of the MSCI UK Select Quality Yield index (tracked by BMO MSCI UK Income Leaders ETF (LON:ZILK)) 
  2. +8.7% total return of the FTSE 350 ex Investment Trust Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 5% Capped Index (tracked by Lyxor FTSE UK Quality Low Vol Dividend (DR) UCITS ETF (LON:DOSH).
  3. +7.9% total return of the WisdomTree UK Equity Income Index (tracked by WisdomTree UK Equity Income UCITS ETF (LON:WUKD)

This compares to +12.3% for FTSE 100 (best tracked by HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (LON:HUKX)).

Best performing over last 3 years
The best performing strategies for UK Equity Income over the last 3 years were:

  1. +26.4% cumulative total return of the FTSE 350 ex Investment Trust Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 5% Capped Index (tracked by Lyxor FTSE UK Quality Low Vol Dividend (DR) UCITS ETF (LON:DOSH).
  2. +20.8% cumulative total return of the WisdomTree UK Equity Income Total Return Index (tracked by WisdomTree UK Equity Income UCITS ETF (LON:WUKD).
  3. +18.1% cumulative total return of the FTSE UK Dividend+ Index (tracked by iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (LON:IUKD).

This compares to +31.5% cumulative return for FTSE 100 (best tracked by HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (LON:HUKX)).

Fig. 1: Total Returns (Cumulative) by strategy/index (cumulative, GBP terms)

Best risk-adjusted returns
The best risk-adjusted returns in 2017 of available UK Equity Income indices was achieved by:

  1. MSCI UK Select Quality Yield index (tracked by BMO MSCI UK Income Leaders ETF), with a 1Y Sharpe ratio of 1.40
  2. FTSE 350 ex Inv Trust Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 5% Capped Index (tracked by Lyxor FTSE UK Quality Low Vol Dividend (DR) UCITS ETF) with a 1Y Sharpe ratio of 1.07
  3. WisdomTree UK Equity Income Total Return Index (tracked by WisdomTree UK Equity Income UCITS ETF) with a 1Y Sharpe ratio of 0.97.

To look at consistency of risk-adjusted returns, we have plotted 1Y Sharpe ratios vs 3Y Sharpe ratios for each UK Equity Income index strategy in Fig.2 below.

Fig.2.  1Y & 3Y Sharpe Ratios, selected UK Equity Income index strategies (GBP terms)

Conclusion
Different index construction methodologies has a material impact on performance outcomes – both in absolute terms and on a risk-adjusted basis.

A naïve interpretation is to consider performance in isolation, however our view is that index selection is more nuanced than that: it should relate to the objectives and constraints of individual client portfolios and the desired exposure  -  on asset-basis, risk-basis and factor-basis and the interaction between the selected strategy and the rest of a client portfolio.

Note: Scope of our comparison
For these reports, we have analysed the indices and ETFs detailed in Fig.3.

Fig. 3: UK Equity Income Indices & ETFs vs HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (LON:HUKX)

[ENDS]
NOTICES: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it.
This article has been written for a US and UK audience.  Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “NYSEARCA:” (NYSE Arca Exchange) for US readers; “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers.  For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.  This blog reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of Elston Consulting, its clients or affiliates.  For information and disclaimers, please see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk
Photo credit: N/A; Chart credit: Elston Consulting; Table credit: Elston Consulting
All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.
Chart data is as at 30-Dec-17


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. When pol
Post a Comment
Read more

Market timing is a mug’s game

John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing.  While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are. Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game.  Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade.  Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes.  Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go. The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment.  An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry.  The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakness and increase their alloca
1 comment
Read more

UK votes for Brexit

UK public votes 52% to 48% to leave the EU: the exit process could take 2 to 4 years. Regional differences will create further constitutional strain on the UK Pound plunging, and expect UK Equities to follow suit. Expect flight to safety away from risk assets as the market digests the potential for structural change. Brexit it is The UK public has voted to leave the European Union after 43 years in yesterday’s referendum. Leave has 51.7% of votes so far with 71.8% turnout (higher than pervious general election) suggests a vote for Brexit by a narrow margin. The leaving process could take a minimum of two years, and even Leave campaigners don’t expect the process to complete until 2020. Opinion polls were too close to call Polling pointed to a closer result and recent momentum for the Remain campaign which had given markets an element of (false) security: the final poll put 45% Leave, 44% Remain, 11% Don’t Know.  While the binary nature of the debate suggested tha
Post a Comment
Read more