Skip to main content

Which was the best performing UK Equity Income index in 2017?


  • In the search for yield, UK Equity Income is a key component of client portfolios.
  • There are a number of London-listed UK Equity Income ETFs to choose from, each tracking a different index methodology.
  • This report looks at the best performing UK Equity Income indices in absolute and risk-adjusted terms for GBP investors.


UK Equity Income Indices
Investors have a choice of UK Equity Income index strategies, each with different risk-return characteristics, weightings methodologies and factor tilts.
These difference influence the performance of each index strategy (all figures below are on a total return basis for GBP investors).

Best performing for 2017
The best performing strategies for UK Equity Income in 2017 were:

  1. +12.3% total return of the MSCI UK Select Quality Yield index (tracked by BMO MSCI UK Income Leaders ETF (LON:ZILK)) 
  2. +8.7% total return of the FTSE 350 ex Investment Trust Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 5% Capped Index (tracked by Lyxor FTSE UK Quality Low Vol Dividend (DR) UCITS ETF (LON:DOSH).
  3. +7.9% total return of the WisdomTree UK Equity Income Index (tracked by WisdomTree UK Equity Income UCITS ETF (LON:WUKD)

This compares to +12.3% for FTSE 100 (best tracked by HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (LON:HUKX)).

Best performing over last 3 years
The best performing strategies for UK Equity Income over the last 3 years were:

  1. +26.4% cumulative total return of the FTSE 350 ex Investment Trust Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 5% Capped Index (tracked by Lyxor FTSE UK Quality Low Vol Dividend (DR) UCITS ETF (LON:DOSH).
  2. +20.8% cumulative total return of the WisdomTree UK Equity Income Total Return Index (tracked by WisdomTree UK Equity Income UCITS ETF (LON:WUKD).
  3. +18.1% cumulative total return of the FTSE UK Dividend+ Index (tracked by iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (LON:IUKD).

This compares to +31.5% cumulative return for FTSE 100 (best tracked by HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (LON:HUKX)).

Fig. 1: Total Returns (Cumulative) by strategy/index (cumulative, GBP terms)

Best risk-adjusted returns
The best risk-adjusted returns in 2017 of available UK Equity Income indices was achieved by:

  1. MSCI UK Select Quality Yield index (tracked by BMO MSCI UK Income Leaders ETF), with a 1Y Sharpe ratio of 1.40
  2. FTSE 350 ex Inv Trust Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 5% Capped Index (tracked by Lyxor FTSE UK Quality Low Vol Dividend (DR) UCITS ETF) with a 1Y Sharpe ratio of 1.07
  3. WisdomTree UK Equity Income Total Return Index (tracked by WisdomTree UK Equity Income UCITS ETF) with a 1Y Sharpe ratio of 0.97.

To look at consistency of risk-adjusted returns, we have plotted 1Y Sharpe ratios vs 3Y Sharpe ratios for each UK Equity Income index strategy in Fig.2 below.

Fig.2.  1Y & 3Y Sharpe Ratios, selected UK Equity Income index strategies (GBP terms)

Conclusion
Different index construction methodologies has a material impact on performance outcomes – both in absolute terms and on a risk-adjusted basis.

A naïve interpretation is to consider performance in isolation, however our view is that index selection is more nuanced than that: it should relate to the objectives and constraints of individual client portfolios and the desired exposure  -  on asset-basis, risk-basis and factor-basis and the interaction between the selected strategy and the rest of a client portfolio.

Note: Scope of our comparison
For these reports, we have analysed the indices and ETFs detailed in Fig.3.

Fig. 3: UK Equity Income Indices & ETFs vs HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (LON:HUKX)

[ENDS]
NOTICES: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.  I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it.
This article has been written for a US and UK audience.  Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “NYSEARCA:” (NYSE Arca Exchange) for US readers; “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers.  For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.  This blog reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of Elston Consulting, its clients or affiliates.  For information and disclaimers, please see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk
Photo credit: N/A; Chart credit: Elston Consulting; Table credit: Elston Consulting
All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.
Chart data is as at 30-Dec-17


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More for less: Stateside ETFs have just got cheaper

BlackRock announced today that is cutting its fees on its iShares Core (US) range.  Investors can gain broad market exposures for 4-14bp.  This compares to 7-25bp for the iShares Core (UK) range. A diversified multi-asset 70/30 ETF portfolio will cost US investors can 8bp (that’s 8 cents per $100), compared to 14bp for a similar strategy for UK investors. Might the UK follow suit? We’ll see. Big dreams The cuddly  caption announcing the move says “Smaller Fees means Bigger Dreams”, which is warm-hearted.  But it’s also sort of fair.  Today’s retail investor has more access to breadth and depth of international markets than our parents ever dreamed of (if they ever dreamed of that sort of thing). What does this mean, apart from being cheaper? Well firstly, Moore’s law applies to ETF pricing & capacity as much as it does to semiconductors.  That’s not  new or surprising.  But the sustained deflationary pressure on fund fees is ...

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...

Investors in UK property ETFs not affected by £9bn property funds lock-in

Trading in UK property funds totalling £9bn AUM has been suspended, locking investors into an asset class exposure they may no longer wish to have. This is a stark reminder that the liquidity of any fund is only as good as its underlying holdings Investors using UK property ETFs are unaffected owing to the more liquid nature of the structure and of the underlying Post-Brexit fears around commercial property values has led to managers of three UK property funds locking investors in.  They fear a potential rush of investors to sell units following the Brexit result in the EU Referendum.  Decisions to suspend will typically reviewed every 28 days.  The funds affected are those managed by Standard Life, Aviva and M&G, totalling some £9bn of assets (see table). While the justification given – to “protect the interests of all investors in the fund” – is fair and reasonable, some investors may not be too happy to be locked in for potentially quite a s...