Skip to main content

"The Magnificent Seven": key asset classes for a diversified ETF portfolio


"Asset allocation is not everything. It's the only thing."
One of the harshest lessons of the Global Financial Crisis was that when the going gets tough, correlations trend to one, giving even diversified investors very few places to hide.  It wasn't about whether or not you got burned, it was a more a question of degree.
While there's a time and a place for active stock selection, from a portfolio construction perspective, it's the active management of the overall asset allocation that affects the outcome.
Using ETFs for portfolio construction
The growing popularity in Exchange Traded Funds is in part because of their elegance in providing broad, liquid, efficient and cost-effective market access to most major asset classes with a single trade.  We now have a broad range of building blocks with which to construct a diversified portfolio.
As a result, the problem for investors has shifted from "How best can I access a broad choice of markets?", to "How do I create a portfolio that suits my needs?"
How many ETFs are needed to create a portfolio?
To create a portfolio with too few ETFs would mean there is limited scope to create different asset allocation strategies.  To create a portfolio with too many ETFs introduces additional complexity, oversight requirements, and a higher degree of trading costs if the portfolio is to be regularly rebalanced.
So what is the minimum number of ETFs needed to create a well-diversified portfolio?
A Strategic Core
For a strategic portfolio for a UK investor with £100,000 to invest and a desire to keep trading and ongoing costs to a minimum, we believe that advisers can construct strategic asset allocation models using the following “Magnificent Seven” broad asset classes alongside cash: UK Government Bonds, UK Corporate Bonds, Global Corporate Bonds, UK Property, UK Equities, Global Equities and Emerging Market Equities.
All 7 of these asset classes can be accessed through BlackRock's iShares range, mostly from their cost-efficient Core range.
Importantly, these ETFs are 'cash-based' or 'physical' meaning that they actually own the underlying holdings (unlike some ‘swap-based’ or ‘synthetic’ ETFs).
 Liquidity and diversification
The fund sizes of these ETFs ranges from approx £400m to £4bn meaning external liquidity is high.  Internal liquidity is as good as the underlying securities the ETF and index holds.
While investors see only seven holdings, a portfolio containing these 7 large and liquid ETF building blocks represents a diversified portfolio of some 6,901 individual securities, all of which are fully disclosed for each fund.
Strategic or Tactical
After creating a strategic asset allocation model, ETFs mean that tactical asset allocation changes can be executed in real-time, which can give significant implementation advantage in these volatile times.
As a starting point for advisers look to provide low-cost portfolio construction, using ETF building blocks for these key seven asset classes are a helpful first step.

www.elstonconsulting.co.uk

 NOTICE
This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of date of publication and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by Elston Consulting to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by Elston Consulting, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader.  ©2016 Elston Consulting Limited. All rights reserved. BirthStar, Elston Gamma, and Elston Strategic Beta are registered trademarks of Elston Consulting Limited. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.
Labels:
Location: London, UK

Popular posts from this blog

Market timing is a mug’s game

John Authers’ Long View article in the FT this weekend addresses market timing.  While he claims that just passive investors are such bad timers, we would go further: most are. Attempts to time the market (choosing the right moment to buy or sell into risk assets) are a mug’s game.  Great for brokerages that delight in investors’ fees levied to senselessly overtrade.  Bad for investor’s portfolio outcomes.  Despite the annual survey by Dalbar that investors’ attempts to time the market is really bad for their portfolio, people – including some portfolio managers – still try and have a go. The problem is that in timing the market, we become slaves to our behavioural biases around entry points, and the noise around market sentiment.  An investor fearing Brexit might have – out of emotion – sold everything to cash stocked up on gold sovereigns and run for the hills whilst tracing Irish ancestry.  The smart thing was to acknowledge sterling weakn...
1 comment
Read more

The cost of Marmite, and Brexit’s quiet fear gauge

UK commentators are looking for data points that vindicate the Referendum result one way or the other Sterling’s slide and the FTSE 100 Index level together or in isolation are not the best indicators for a Brexit fear gauge The potential inflationary impact of a ‘hard Brexit’ has caused UK breakeven rates to spike, creating a real challenge for the Bank of England Give me a sign Just as high priests in Roman times, after slaughtering their offering, examined its entrails to gauge the Gods’ favour,  so too have UK commentators been searching for any statistical insight or market data point to declare whether the shock Brexit result is likely to lead to economic success or failure. The data point phoney war The data that has come out since the EU Referendum on 23 rd June 2016 is meaningless as we still don’t know what Brexit looks like.  It’s been a phoney war for headlines, as stunned commentators search for a gauge to measure policymakers by. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UK votes for Brexit

UK public votes 52% to 48% to leave the EU: the exit process could take 2 to 4 years. Regional differences will create further constitutional strain on the UK Pound plunging, and expect UK Equities to follow suit. Expect flight to safety away from risk assets as the market digests the potential for structural change. Brexit it is The UK public has voted to leave the European Union after 43 years in yesterday’s referendum. Leave has 51.7% of votes so far with 71.8% turnout (higher than pervious general election) suggests a vote for Brexit by a narrow margin. The leaving process could take a minimum of two years, and even Leave campaigners don’t expect the process to complete until 2020. Opinion polls were too close to call Polling pointed to a closer result and recent momentum for the Remain campaign which had given markets an element of (false) security: the final poll put 45% Leave, 44% Remain, 11% Don’t Know.  While the binary nature of the debate suggested...
Post a Comment
Read more